Or so it seems

Looks like the dear 15 year old still doesn't understand, huh. Checked back at her blog, and guess what i saw?

Or was the standard of my English in this post too hard for you to understand? I suggest you go through my post again before you start saying that you don't understand anything else and go off shooting your mouth again. Then again, it's your blog, freedom of speech, hun. I have made it clear as to why i felt like it was implied, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who agreed with that.
Anyways, the point of it was that you made an unnecessary comment (haven't anyone told you if you've got nothing good to say, don't say anything?) that seemed like it carried an implied meaning, and went to made an accusation that I WAS the one that commented regarding it.

It's simple really, if you were REALLY sincere about the apology, your apology wouldn't have been a mere explanation which merely sounded like excuses you made up (well, to me at least). Actions speak louder than words, girl. After you found out it wasn't an overload of blusher, what did you do? You just let things be. You could've easily removed the accusations (of me wearing a lot of make up and about the comment on your cbox), but no, you did not.

WOW, "And like, I apologized", must be condescending for you, huh.

Just because you sent me an apology, it doesn't mean that I have to accept it. The mere reason being that it wasn't sincere, and as obviously shown in the picture above, you didn't acknowledge where you went wrong and it made me glad that i chose not to reply your 'apology'. What it was is just a half-assed email full of excuses to justify yourself that you merely copied and paste off the blog post that you posted. Am i not right to say this? What do you guys think?